|
Epicurius was "at the same time one of the most
revered and most reviled of all founders of thought in the Graeco-Roman
world."[1] He taught that the physical world was all
there was, that it had always existed and would last forever. Not only was
there no Creator, there was no God in charge of the universe to give life
purpose. Men simply lived and then died - so while he is alive a man should
seek to maximise pleasure and minimise pain.[2] Such teaching
resulted in his teaching being attacked by Platonist, Stoic and Christian
alike,[3] indeed many of the criticisms of the Epicureans
found in the writings of the early church fathers are simply rehearsals of the
attacks of earlier writers.
Despite the accusations of his enemies Epicurius was
an intelligent man who, having discovered what he believed to be the truth,
determined to share that knowledge with everyone. In so doing he created the
first world philosophy which appealed both to Greeks and non-Greeks. His
activity may even have served to aid the spread of the Gospel.[4]
Epicurius opposed Platonism (then the dominant
philosophy), seeking to revive the physical theories of the Ionian
philosophers,[5] especially those of Democritus. Influenced
by the flood of information that Aristotle and his contemporaries had gathered
about the world, he made the senses, rather than reason the test of truth. If
the senses appeared to be wrong, then "the mistakes were not in the sense
but in reason, which made a mistaken inference from the sense data."[6]
Instead of listing the tenets of the Epicurean atomic
theory (which have been well summarised elsewhere)[7] we will
look at what his School taught about the origin of life on earth. In our study
we are fortunate that besides the small number of Epicurius works that
survive we also have an exposition of the Epicurean system by the Roman poet
Lucretius (94-55 BC). From these we learn that this world is the result of the
chance collision of atoms, there is no room for any concept of a divine power
involved in creation in the Epicurean system.[8] Lucretius
points to the imperfection of the present world as evidence of this.[9] Over a tremendous period of time a whirlwind of randomly
moving atoms began to sort themselves out. The heaviest settled to the centre
of the whirlwind, forming the earth. The lighter ones formed the sea, sun, moon
and stars. As the atoms became compressed the earth shrank and salt water was
forced out onto the surface forming he seas.[10] Plants and
trees sprang spontaneously from the new-formed earth, next animals formed from
the effect of the sun upon the earth.[11]
There was a great superfluity
of heat and moisture in the soil. So, wherever a suitable spot occurred, there
grew up wombs, clinging to the earth by roots. These, when the time was ripe,
were burst open by the maturation of the embryos, rejecting moisture now and
struggling for air. Then nature directed towards the spot the pores of the
earth, making it open its veins and exude a juice resembling milk
The
young were fed by the earth, clothed by the warmth and bedded by the herbage,
which was then covered by an abundance of soft down. The childhood of the earth
provoked no hard frosts or excessive heats or winds of boisterous violence. For
all things keep pace in their growth and attainment of their full strength.[12]
The process was far from perfect, as
Lucretius describes:
In those days the earth
attempted also to produce a host of monsters, grotesque in build and aspect -
hermaphrodites, halfway between the sexes yet cut off from either, creatures
bereft of feet of disposed of hands, dumb, mouthless brutes, or eyeless and
blind, or disabled by the adhesion of their limbs to the trunk, so, that they
could neither do anything nor go anywhere nor keep out of harms way nor
take what they needed. These and other such monstrous and misshapen births
were created. But all in vain. Nature debarred them from increase.
In those days, again, many species must have died out altogether and
failed to reproduce their kind. Every species that you now see drawing the
breath of life has been protected and preserved from the beginning of the world
either by cunning or by prowess or by speed.[13]
So, according the Lucretius, the living world formed
spontaneously, and developed into its present form by survival of the fittest.
He is adamant that creatures of legend, such as the Centaur, Chimera and
Scyllas (combinations of two animals) were completely fictional.[14] Lucretius does not distinguish the emergence of mankind
from that of the animals.[15] As the earth grew older and
was no longer able to spontaneously produce offspring.[16]
With the passage of time the bodies of men became weaker and they learned how
to build, make fires and began to live in families and form alliances with one
another.[17]
Given the details of the Epicurean teaching on the
origin of the universe it is not altogether surprising that Epicurius are seen
as champions of Evolution by some writers.[18] It is worth
noting, however, that the Epicurean theories were not based upon any empirical
evidence.
Rob Bradshaw, Webmaster
References
[1] Norman Wentworth
DeWitt, Epicurius and His Philosophy. (Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press, 1954), 3
[2] Everett Ferguson,
Backgrounds of Early Christianity, 2nd edn. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1993), 353.
[3] DeWitt,
3
[4] DeWitt, 8:
"Epicureanism served in the ancient world as a preparation for
Christianity, helping to bridge the gap between Greek intellectualism and a
religious way of life. It shunted the emphasis from a political to the social
virtues and offered what may be called a religion of humanity. The mistake is
to overlook the terminology and ideology of Epicureanism in the New Testament
and to think of its founder as an enemy of religion.
[5] DeWitt,
15
[6] Everett Ferguson,
Backgrounds of Early Christianity, 2nd edn. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1993), 352
[7] DeWitt, 156-157;
Everett Ferguson, Backgrounds of Early Christianity, 2nd edn. (Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 1993), 350-352; Benjamin Farrington, The Faith of Epicurius
(London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967), 112-113.
[8] Lucretius, On
the Nature of the Universe, trans. R.E. Latham, 1951. (Harmondsworth:
Penguin, 1973), 175-177
[9] Lucretius,
177
[10] Lucretius,
184-186
[11] Lucretius,
195
[12] Lucretius,
195-197
[13] Lucretius,
195-196. Italics in original translation
[14] Lucretius, 198;
J.M. Rist, Epicurius: An Introduction. (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1972), 70-71.
[15] Rist,
71.
[16] Lucretius,
196
[17] Lucretius, 202
[18] O.E. Lavenstein,
"The Pre-Socratics, Lucretius, and Modern Science," D.R. Dudley,
Lucretius. (London: Routledge & Kenan Paul, 1965), 13.
|