Synopsis
THEODORE OF MOPSUESTIA, b. at Antioch about 350; d.
at Mopsuestia, in Cilicia secunda, 423 or 429; one of the chief leaders
of the Antiochian school of theology. As a preparation for a juridical career,
he studied philosophy and rhetoric under the famous Libanius, but at the same
time he made the acquaintance of Chrysostom; and
the religious enthusiasm of the latter induced him to devote his life to
Christian philosophy and asceticism. Soon after, however, he repented of the
change, and meditated a return to his former occupation; but the reproaches and
admonitions of his friend finally decided him (see Chrysostom: Ad Theod.
lapsum). His biblical studies he made under Diodorus the presbyter,
afterwards bishop of Tarsus: indeed, his whole character as a theologian was
modelled by Diodorus. He was ordained a presbyter in the Church of Antioch, and
as a teacher in the school he soon acquired a great reputation. John,
afterwards bishop of Antioch, Theodoret, and perhaps, also, Nestorius, were
among his pupils. In 392 he was elected bishop of Mopsuestia; and in 394 he was
present at a synod in Constantinople, where the emperor, Theodosius I., is said
to have been very much impressed by his preaching. Throughout the whole Eastern
Church his name had a great weight: even Cyril of
Alexandria, to whom he sent his Commentary on Job, felt the greatest esteem
for him. Nor did the attitude he assumed in the Pelagian controversy in any way impair his authority.
It was not until the outbreak of the Nestorian controversy, and the clash
between the christology of the Antiochian school and that of the Alexandrian
school, that his name came into bad odor; but he died just as the controversy
began.
Theodore was a very prolific writer. A great
number of his works were devoted to the interpretation of Scripture. He wrote
commentaries on Genesis, the Psalms, the Prophets, Job, the four Gospels, the
Acts, and the Pauline Epistles; but, unfortunately, only his Commentary on the
Minor Prophets which, however, is very instructive with respect to his
exegetical method has come down to us in its original Greek text. A Latin
Commentary on the minor Pauline Epistles, which Pitra has published under the
name of Hilary of Poitiers, is now generally
considered as belonging to Theodore; and extracts of his other commentaries
have been collected by Wegnern, A. Mai, and Fritzsche, from the catenae.
Under the influence of the Alexandrian school, the mystico-allegorical
interpretation of Scripture prevailed throughout the Greek Church, more
especially the christological interpretation of the Old Testament, totally
neglecting the organical connection and all historical relations. In opposition
to this method of exegesis, Theodore, following the track of Eusebius of Emesa
and Diodorus of Tarsus, placed a simple, direct interpretation, based on the
given historical conditions; not that he, for instance, denied the idea of
prophecy, but he confined its application within very narrow limits, outside of
which he ascribed to it only a typical designation. Thus he referred all the
messianic Psalms, with the exception of three, to Zerubbabel and Hezekiah, and
denied altogether that the Old Testament knew any thing of the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Spirit as forming the Trinity. Equally free was his treatment of
the canon. He distinguished between historical, prophetical, and pedagogical
books; and the last group (Job, the Solomonic writings) he criticised without
reserve. The Canticles he rejected altogether, and spoke of with great
contempt.
It took some time before the Pelagian
controversy, which originated in the West, reached the East, and at first it
made no deep impression there. Nevertheless, there came a moment when Theodore
felt compelled to snake an open attack on the Augustinian doctrine of
hereditary sin; and he wrote his book Against those who say that man falls
by nature, and not by sentence. The book itself has perished: but Marius
Mercator has preserved some fragments of it in Latin translation; and Photius,
who had read it, gives a summary of its contents. It was directed against
Augustine, but addressed to Jerome. The latter is very plainly indicated by allusions
to his translation of the Bible, his journey to the East, etc.; and the
circumstance that he had spread the new heresy in Syria; by writing books in
its defence was the very cause of Theodores interference. Theodore
absolutely rejects such propositions as these, that man, originally created
good and immortal, became bad and mortal by Adams sin; that sin now has
its origin in human nature, and not in the will of man; that newly born infants
are tainted by sin, and must obtain forgiveness by baptism, and eating the Lords Supper; that marriage and generation are
the evil results of an evil nature, etc. According to Marius Mercator and
Photius, he even went so far as to assert that man was created mortal by God,
and that the doctrine of death as a punishment of sin is a mere fiction
invented for the purpose of sharpening mans hatred of sin. In his
Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans he expresses himself very cautiously on
this point; and, though he does not directly deviate from the Pauline doctrine
of the relation between sin and death, he evidently considered the history of
the human race so closely connected with the general development of the world,
that death became to his eyes a necessary and indispensable transition in human
existence. At a later date, Julian of Eclanum, and other Pelagians who were
expelled from Italy, found refuge with him. It is therefore a mistake to say,
that at a provincial council he took part in the condemnation of
Pelagianism.
The exegetical principle of Theodore, as
well as the position he took in the Pelagian contro-
[2326]
versy, gives a preliminary idea of his
christological views. While presbyter of Antioch, he wrote fifteen books on the
incarnation, and a special work against Eunomius. Thirty years later on, as
bishop of Mopsuestia, he wrote a work against Apollinaris. These books have perished, with the
exception of a few fragments; but we know that he was the true representative
of the speculative theology of the Antiochian school, and that, in
contradistinction to the Alexandrian school, he emphasized in his christology
the completeness of the human nature of Christ, and its indelible difference
from his divine nature. It was, however, not he, but Nestorius, who was
destined to carry this view to its last consequences, and fight for it in the
world. At the Council of Ephesus (431) no one dared
to attack Theodore directly; and, though open attacks were made upon him
shortly after by Marius Mercator and Rabulas of Edessa, it took more than a
century before the Alexandrian theologians succeeded in weaning the Eastern
Church from its great teacher, and branding his name with the stamp of heresy.
W. Müller, "THEODORE OF MOPSUESTIA,"
Philip Schaff, ed., A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of Biblical,
Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology, 3rd edn, Vol. 4. Toronto,
New York & London: Funk & Wagnalls Company, 1894. pp.2325-26.

 |
A. Migana, "The Commentary of Theodore
of Mopseustia on the Nicene Creed," Woodbrooke Studies, Vol. 5.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932. |
 |
A. Migana, "The Commentary of Theodore
of Mopseustia on the Lord's Prayer and the Sacraments of Baptism and the
Eucharist," Woodbrooke Studies, Vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1933. |

 |
Joanne McWilliam Dewart, The
Theology of Grace of Theodore of Mopsuestia. Studies in Christian
Antiquity. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1971. Pbk.
ISBN: 0813205239. pp.160. {Amazon.com} |
 |
Rowan A. Greer, Theodore of
Mopsuestia: Exegete and Theologian. London : Faith Press, 1961.
pp.173. |
 |
Robert C. Hill, "His Master's Voice:
Theodore of Mopsuestia on the Psalms," Heythrop Journal 45.1 (January
2004): 40-53. |
 |
Frederick G. McLeod, "Theodore of
Mopsuestia Revisited," Theological Studies 61.3 (2000):
447-480. |
 |
Frederick G. McCleod, "The
Christological Ramifications of Theodore of Mopsuestia's Understanding of
Baptism and the Eucharist," Journal of Early Christian Studies 10.1
(2002): 37-75. |
 |
J.L. McKenzie, "The Commentary of
Theodore of Mopsuestia on John 1:46-51," Theological Studies14 (1953):
73-84. |
 |
K. McNamara, "The Problem of Theodore
of Mopsuestia," Irish Theological Quarterly 24 (1957):
175-84. |
 |
Richard A. Norris, Manhood and
Christ: A Study in the Christology of Theodore of Mopsuestia. London:
Oxford University Press, 1963. pp.xv + 274. |
 |
J. Quasten, "The Liturgical Mysticism
of Theodore of Mopsuestia," Theological Studies 15 (1954):
431-39. |
 |
Hugh M. Riley, Christian Initiation:
A Comparative Study of the Interpretation of the Baptismal Liturgy in the
Mystagogical Writings of Cyril of Jerusalem, John Chrysostom. Washington,
D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1974. ISBN: 081320531X. {Amazon.com} |
 |
J.S. Romanides, "Highlights in the
Debate Over Theodore of Mopsuestia's Christology and Some Suggestions for a
Fresh Approach," Greek Orthodox Theological Review 5.2 (1959s):
140-85. |
 |
Francis A. Sullivan, "Some Reactions to
Devreese's New Study of Theodore of Mopsueste," Theological Studies 12
(1951): 197-207. |
 |
Francis A. Sullivan, "Further Notes on
Theod. Mops (Reply to J.L. McKenzie)," Theological Studies 20 (1959):
264-79. |
 |
Francis A. Sullivan, The Christology
of Theodore of Mopsuestia. Rome: Pontifical Gregorian University Press,
1956. |
 |
Francis A. Sullivan, "Further Notes on
Theodore of Mopsuestia," Theological Studies 20 (1959):
264-279. |
 |
Dudley Tyng, "Theodore of Mopsuestia as an
Interpreter of the Old Testament," Journal of Biblical Literature 50
(1931): 298-303.  |
 |
R.P. Vaggione, "Some Neglected
Fragments of Theodore of Mopsuestia's 'Contra Eunomium'," Journal of
Theological Studies, n.s., Vol. 30 (1980): 403-470. |
 |
A. Vööbus, "Regarding the
Theological Anthropology of Theodore of Mopsuestia," Church History,
Vol. 33 (1964): 115-124. |
 |
Maurice F. Wiles, "Theodore of
Mopsuestia as Representative of the Antiochene School." P.R. Ackroyd & C.F.
Evans, eds. The Cambridge History of the Bible, Vol. 1. From
Beginnings to Jerome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Hbk.
ISBN: 0521074185. pp.489-509. {Amazon.com} |
 |
Dimitri Zaharopoulos, "Theodore of
Mopsuestia's Critical Methods in Old Testament Study," Dissertation
Abstracts 26 (1965): 2901-02. |
 |
Dimitri Zaharopoulos, "Theodore of
Mopsuestia: Views on Prophetic Inspiration," Greek Orthodox Theological
Review 23.1 (1978): 42-52. |
 |
Dimitri
Z. Zaharopoulos, Theodore of Mopsuestia on the Bible. Theological
Inquiries. New York: Paulist, 1989. Pbk. ISBN: 0809130912. pp.223. {Amazon.com} |

 |
R.A. Greer, Theodore of Mopsuestia:
Exegete and Theologian. London: Fauth, 1961, |

|