Very little is known about Theophilus of
Antioch apart from the few autobiographical references in his sole surviving
work, To Autolycus. We learn from this that he was converted -
apparently as an adult through his personal study of the Scriptures.1 Eusebius, writing in his
History of the Church, named him as the sixth bishop of Antioch in
Syria2 (169-177).3 To
Theophilus belongs the distinction of being not only the founder of Christian
biblical chronology,4 but also that of being the
first Christian writer to have produced (a surviving) commentary on the book of
Genesis.5 Because of his interest in both these
areas Theophilus writings are particularly relevant to our present
study.
Theophilus appears to have been familiar
with the writings of the major schools of philosophy, if only through secondary
sources.10 Book 2 opens with an attack on
idolatry and philosophy, including Plato, Homer, Hesiod
and the Epicureans.11
Despite this open hostility modern scholars acknowledge that Theophilus himself
was deeply influenced by Stoicism.12 Such are his disagreements with the teachings of pagan
myths and philosophies concerning the creation of
the world that he feels it necessary to set down his own exposition of the text
of Genesis. In this he closely followed established Jewish
exegesis13 and
his example was followed by many later writers.14
Theophilus interpretation is also distinctly Christian with several
distinctly New Testament themes (such as baptism)15 being read into
the text, as well as numerology16 and several
anti-heretical teachings.17
1 Theophilus,
Autolycus, 1.14 (ANF, Vol. 2, 93).
2 According to
Eusebius, History, 4.20 (NPNF, 2nd series, Vol. 1,
197).
3 Frederick W.
Norris, "Theophilus of Antioch," EEC, 895.
4 Marcus Dods,
ANF, Vol. 2, 87.
5 May,
156.
6 Theophilus,
Autolycus, 1.5-7 (ANF, Vol. 2, 90-91).
7 Theophilus,
Autolycus, 1.7 (ANF, Vol. 2, 91).
8 Theophilus,
Autolycus, 1.8 (ANF, Vol. 2, 91).
9 Theophilus,
Autolycus, 1.9-11 (ANF, Vol. 2, 91-92).
10 Norris, 895,
argues that "Theophilus has a command of rhetoric and a knowledge of Greek
philosophy that went beyond cursory handbook reference", while Grant, 149,
writes that "in his apology he frequently refers to such authors, though his
citations from almost all come from anthologies of poetry and philosophical
opinions. He is no student of literature, though he tries to give the
impression that he is one."
11 Theophilus,
Autolycus, 2.4 (ANF, Vol. 2, 95).
12 Robert M.
Grant, "Theophilus of Antioch to Autolycus," HTR, Vol. 40
(1947): 254; Kathleen E. McVey, "The Use of Stoic Cosmogony in Theophilus
of Antiochs Hexaemeron," Mark S. Burrows & Paul Rorem, eds.
Biblical Hermeneutics in Historical Perspective: Studies in Honor of
Karlfried Froehlich on His Sixtieth Birthday. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1991): 32-58.
13 Frend,
Rise, 252; Robert M. Grant, Greek Apologists of the Second
Century. (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1988), 157-159; May,
163.
14 Jean
Daniélou, Gospel Message and Hellenistic Culture. (Philadelphia:
Westminster Press, 1980), 390; Grant, Antioch, 227. Those influenced by
his exegesis included Eusebius of Caesarea, Methodius, Epiphanius, Procopius of
Gaza, John of Damascus, Novation, Lactantius, Jerome and Minusius
Felix.
15 Theophilus,
Autolycus, 2.24 (ANF, Vol. 2, 101): "On the fifth day
the things proceeding from the waters were blessed by God, that this also might
be a sign of mens being destined to receive repentance and remission of
sins, through the water and laver of regeneration, - as many who come to the
truth, and are born again, and receive blessing from God."
16 Theophilus,
Autolycus, 2.15 (ANF, Vol. 2, 100-101).
17 Grant,
Apologists, 160.