Synopsis
CYPRIANUS, Thascius Cecilius, which
last name he assumed in honor of an old presbyter, Cæcilius, who was
instrumental in his conversion to Christianity, was born in Northern Africa,
towards the close of the second, or in the beginning of the third, century, and
educated at Carthage, where, in the fourth decade of the third century, he held
a prominent position as a teacher of rhetoric. He was a man of wealth. His
house and gardens were beautiful, his landed property considerable. He was also
a man of elegance and dignity, both in dress and manners, both in literary
productions and in business affairs. Of the history of his conversion
nothing is known, but he was baptized in 245 or 246. Immediately after
baptism he gave away a part of his fortune to the poor; and all his time he
seems to have devoted to the study of the Bible and the Christian writers of
the second century. His Epistolai acd Donatum, De Idolorum Vanitate, and
Libri III. Testimoniorum adv. Judæes, in the last two of which
works he closely follows Minucius Felix and Tertullians Apologeticus, belong to this
period.
The African Church was at this period
flourishing enough externally, but internally its state was rather precarious.
The long peace it had enjoyed (nearly thirty years) had slackened the zeal and
the discipline of its members. Even the character of the episcopate had
suffered. Many of the bishops were engaged in agriculture or trade, or even in
usury. Instances of fraud and swindling occurred among them. Sometimes they
were so ignorant that they could not instruct the catechumens, nor distinguish
between orthodox and heretical compositions. Under such. circumstances the
conversion of a man like Cyprian naturally made a sensation, and awakened
expectations. In 248 the episcopal chair of Carthage became vacant, and he was
elected bishop. It is characteristic, however, that it was the lower mass of
the church-members which carried his election, while a portion of the
presbytery opposed it to the very last. The poor, the ignorant, the humble, of
the Church of Carthage, felt how good it would be to them to have for their
bishop a man of wealth, a man of learning, a man of social standing. They knew
of Cyprian that he was liberal with his means, that he was possessed of
brilliant literary talents, that he showed both decision and tact in business
transactions, and they would hear of no refusal. Between July 248 and April 249
he was consecrated bishop. The opposition did not dissolve, however, after its
defeat. On the contrary, it became more firmly organized; and it soon found a
point from which an attack could be made. Early in 250 Decius issued the edict
for the suppression of Christianity, and the persecution began. Measures were
first taken against the bishops and officers of the church: by slaying the
[592] shepherds it was hoped the flock would be stolen. The proconsul on
circuit, and five commissioners for each town, administered the edict; but,
when the proconsul reached Carthage, Cyprian had fled.
In his book De Lapsis, and in his
letters to his congregation, to his fellow-bishops of the African Church, and
to the clergy of Rome, Cyprian defends very adroitly the line of conduct he had
adopted; but none of the reasons which he proffers the necessity of
preserving himself for the good of his church, the direct command of God
through a vision, etc. arc quite acceptable, and with the idea of
heroism they are altogether incompatible. But it must be remembered, first,
that martyrdom had not yet become a fashion, a rage, the necessary close of a
distinguished life, the greatest grace which God could grant. When the Decian
persecution broke out, Dionysius of Alexandria, Gregory Thaumaturgus, Maximus of Nola, and many
other bishops, did as Cyprian, - fled before the storm. Next, the edict was
directed, principally if not alone, against the bishops, - a circumstance which
could not but influence their policy. In Rome the congregation left, for this
very reason, the episcopal chair unoccupied for sixteen months after the
martyrdom of Fabian. Finally the individual character must be taken into
account. Cyprian was a man of education, not of genius ; he reasoned from
facts, not from enthusiasm; he acted upon convictions, not upon passion. But
with such characters every thing grand is the result of a slow growth, not of a
moments inspiration; and the remark of Augustine about Cyprians
style, that it ripened with age, growing simpler, nobler, and more fit to
express the fulness of Christian truth, must be applied also to his conduct.
Nevertheless, his flight gave his enemies a dangerous weapon in hand. Towards
the close of 250 he sent the two bishops, Caldonius and Herculanus, to Carthage
with money for the poor, with spiritual aid for the weak, with disciplinary
power for those who had fallen. But in Carthage Caldonius and Herculanus met
with the most determined opposition from the side of Felicissimus, a deacon;
and when Cyprian excommunicated Felicissimus, five presbyters, beaded by
Novatus, took up his cause: a schism thus broke out. In spring of 251 Cyprian
returned; and the great question of the re-admission into the Church of the
lapsi, especially of the libellatici, was now to be decided. The
most extreme views found defenders. One party refused altogether to re-admit
the lapsi: another granted them re-admission without any restriction at
all. Cyprian adopted a middle course: after due penance he re-admitted those
who had fallen. In the synods of Carthage (251 and 252) he carried through his
policy, and it became the policy of the whole Christian Church. The two other
parties, however, in which his adversaries were mixed up in a most singular
manner... appointed each an anti-bishop, Maximus and Fortunatus. The schism was
thus complete.
It would seem, however, that the authority
of Cyprian was in no way impaired by this schism. The practical wisdom~ the
inexhaustible energy, and the great self-abnegation with which he administered
to the weal of his flock during the horrible plague which reached Carthage in
252 (see his De Mortalitate and De Eleomosynis), drew all true
Christians close to their bishop; and the schismatics were forgotten. At the
time when the controversy concerning baptism broke out between him and Bishop
Stephen of Rome (255), Cyprian stood undisputedly as the prominent and most
influential leader in the Christian Church. The Roman Church held that baptism
administered in due form was valid, even when administered by a heretic, and
admitted baptized heretics and schismatics by simple imposition of hands; while
Cyprian protested that there was no baptism outside of the orthodox church, and
baptized, or rather re-baptized, heretics and schismatics, before admitting
them into the church. The Roman view held the ground; but it is very
instructive to notice the relation in which Cyprian places himself to the
Bishop of Rome. Acknowledging Rome as the natural centre of Christendom, and
the successor of Peter as primus inter pares, he recognizes the
precedence as one of honor only, and by no means as one of power. Of a feeling
of subordination, of a yielding to a higher power of jurisdiction, there is in
all his tracts and letters not the least trace. The papacy was not yet born. On
the contrary, it is Cyprian who is styled Papa by the Roman bishop; and
he does not give back the title to his interlocutor.
In spring of 257 Ynlerians edict
against the Christians was issued, and in August, Cyprian appeared before the
proconsul, Aspasius Paternus; and, when he refused to offer sacrifice to the
Roman state-gods, he was banished to Curubis, a lonely place on the seashore,
but only a days journey from Carthage. lie lived there eleven nionths, in
decent retirement, and in steady communication with his flock. A new proconsul,
Galerius Maximus, recalled him; but shortly after a much severer edict was
issued, and (Aug. 13) he was again arrested. On Sept. 13 the trial began, and
the next day the proconsul pronounced reluctantly the sentence of death by the
sword. "Deo Gratias I" Cyprian exclaimed. The execution
followed immediately. But the proceedings were carried on, from the side of the
State, sith a regard for the victim which shows the great weight he carried in
public opinion; and the execution was witnessed with a sympathetic awe which
was still vibrating in peoples hearts when Augustine preached.
Hagenbach (Leimbach), "CYPRIANUS, Thascius
Cecilius," Philip Schaff, ed., A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of
Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology, 3rd edn., Vol. 1.
Toronto, New York & London: Funk & Wagnalls Company, 1894.
pp.591-593.

 |
G.W. Clarke, "The Letters of St.
Cyprian of Carthage," Ancient Christian Writers, Vols. 43, 44, 46, 48.
New York: Newman, 1984, 1986, 1988. |
 |
Cyprian (Christian
Classic Ethereal Library) |
 |
Cyprian, The Lapsed; The Unity of the Catholic
Church, M. Bévenor, trans. Ancient Christian Writers, Vol.25. New
York: Newman, 1957. Hbk. ISBN: 0809102609. pp.132. {Amazon.com} |
 |
Cyprian,
Letters, The Fathers of the Church, Vol. 51, Rose Bernard Donna, trans.
Washington, D.C: The Catholic University of America Press, 1992. Hbk. ISBN:
0813200512. pp.352. {Amazon.com} |
 |
Cyprian,
Treatises, The Fathers of the Church, Vol. 36, Roy .J. Deferrari et al,
trans., Washington, D.C: The Catholic University of America Press, 1958. Hbk.
ISBN: 0813200369. pp.372. {Amazon.com} |
 |
R.E.
Wallis, trans. Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 5. Edinburgh: T & T Clark,
1886 / Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1080. Hbk. ISBN: 0802880916. pp.706. {Amazon.com} |

 |
W. Beinert, "Who Can Be Saved?"
Theology Digest 38 (1991): 223-28. |
 |
Maurice Bévenot, "An 'Old Latin'
Quotation (2 Tim 3:2) and Its Adventures in the Mss of St. Cyprianus, De
Unitate Ecclesiae, cp. 16," Studia Patristica 1 (1957):
249-52. |
 |
Maurice Bévenot, "Cyprian's
Platform in the Rebaptism Controversy," Heythrop Journal 19 (1978):
123-42. |
 |
Maurice Bévenot, "Cyprian and
his Recognition of Cornelius," Journal of Theological Studies 28.2
(1977): 346-359. |
 |
Maurice Bévenot, "Sacerdos' as
Understood By Cyprian," Journal of Theological Studies 30.2 (1979):
413-429. |
 |
Maurice
Bévenot, Tradition of Manuscripts: Study in the Transmission of St.
Cyprian's Treatises. London: Greenwood Press, 1979. Hbk. ISBN: 0313206228.
pp.163. {Amazon.com} |
 |
Maurice Bévenot, "The Oldest
Surviving Manuscript of St. Cyprian in the British Library," Journal of
Theological Studies 31.2 (1980): 368-377. |
 |
C.A. Bobertz, "For the vineyard of the
Lord of Hosts was the house of Israel," Jewish Quarterly Review 82
(1991-1992): 1-15. |
 |
Allen Brent, "Cyprian's Reconstruction
of the Martyr Tradition," Journal of Ecclesiastical History 53.2 (2002):
241-268. |
 |
Felix V.A. Boyse, "Cyprian, Lawyer and
Bishop: A Study in Christian Leadership," Simon Greenleaf Law Review 6
(1986/87): 7-30. |
 |
G.W. Clarke, "Prosographical Notes on
the Epistles of Cyprian. II. The Proconsul in Africa in 250 A.D.,"
Latomus 31 (1972): 1053-57. |
 |
G.W. Clarke, "Prosographical Notes on
the Epistles of Cyprian. Rome in August , 258," Latomus 34 (1975):
437-48. |
 |
F.L. Cross, The Early Christian
Fathers. Studies in Theology 1. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.,
1960. Hbk. pp.148-154. |
 |
Rupert E. Davies, "St. Cyprian of
Carthage," London Quarterly and Holborn Review (1958):
198-207. |
 |
Geoffrey D Dunn, "Cyprian and His
Collegae: Patronage and the Episcopal Synod of 252," Journal of Religious
History 27.1 (2003): 1-13. |
 |
Geoffrey D. Dunn, "Pure and Holy
Flock: Cyprian's Pastoral Care of Virgins," Journal of Early Christian
Studies 11.1 (2003): 1-20. |
 |
M.A. Fahey, Cyprian and the Bible: A
Study in Third Century Exegesis. Tübingen: Mohr, 1971. ISBN:
3161322223. pp.696. {Amazon.com} |
 |
Edward Fasholé-Luke, "Christian
Unity: St. Cyprian's and Ours," Scottish Journal of Theology 23 (1970):
312- |
 |
Edward Fasholé-Luke, "Who id the
Bridegroom? An Excursion into St. Cyprian's Use of Scripture," Studia
Patristica 12 (1975): 294-98. |
 |
Paul J. Fitzgerald, "A Model for
Dialogue: Cyprian of Carthage on Ecclesial Discernment," Theological
Studies 59.2 (1998): 236-253. |
 |
Andrew Hamilton, "Cyprian and Church
Unity," Pacifica 8.1 (1995): 9-21. |
 |
P. Hinchcliffe, Cyprian of Carthage
and the Unity of the Christian Church. London: Chapman, 1974, |
 |
Edelhard L. Hummel, The Concept of
Martyrdom according to St. Cyprian of Carthage. Catholic University of
America Studies in Christian Antiquity 9. Washington, DC: Catholic University
of America Press, 1946. pp. xviii + 199. |
 |
John D. Laurance, "Eucharistic Leader
According to Cyprian of Carthage: A New Study," Studia Liturgica 15.2
(1982): 66-75. |
 |
G. Quispel, "African Christianity
before Minucius Felix and Tertullian," J. den Boeft and A.H.M. Kessels, eds,
Actus: Studies in honour of H.L.W. Nelson. Utrecht: Instituut voor
Klassieke Talen, 1982. pp. xiii, 482. |
 |
Charles A. Robertz, "'For the Vineyard
of the Lord of Hosts Was the House of Israel': Cyprian of Carthage and the
Jews," Jewish Quarterly Review 82.1/2 (1991): 1-15. |
 |
John L. Rossner, "New Light On
Cyprian," Anglican Theological Review 40 (1958): 214-219. |
 |
J. Jayakiran Sebastian, "Sensitivity
and Proclamation: Perspectives on Mission from the Writings of Cyprian,"
Mission Studies 15.2 (1998): 40-50. |
 |
Martin
M. Sage, Cyprian. Patristic Monograph Series, Vol. 1. Catholic
Univerisity of America Press, 1975. Pbk. ISBN: 0813209986. pp. vi + 439.
{Amazon.com} |
 |
George Stuart Murdoch Walker,
The Churchmanship of St. Cyprian. London: Lutterworth, 1968. Reprinted:
James Clarke & Co., Ltd., 2002. Pbk. ISBN: 0227171616. pp.108. {Amazon.com} |
 |
Iain Torence, "They Speak to Us Across
the Centuries 2. Cyprian," Expository Times 108.12 (1997):
356-359. |
 |
Maurice F. Wiles, "The Theological
Legacy of St. Cyprian," The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 14.2.
(1963): 139-149. |
 |
Geoffrey Willis, "Saint Cyprian and the
Mixed Chalice," Downside Review 100(339) (1982): 110-115. |


|